Association JUSTICE

Pour le droit à un procès équitable

 

جمعية عدالة

من أجل الحق في محاكمة عادلة

.

Page d'accueil

Statuts

  Rapports et études

Publications

Nos Activités

Programme d'action

Avis et Positions

Textes de loi

 Justice et Presse

Nous Contacter

 

 

 

 The Independence of the Judiciary

In Morocco in the Light of International Standards

And Experiences from the Mediterranean Area

 

           RECOMMENDATIONS

In the light of the previous discussions and conclusions, we forward the following recommendations:

 1-     References and bases for reform:

1.      it has grown necessary for the Moroccan state, represented by its constitutionally mandated bodies, to carry on the ratification of the international treaties relevant to the right for a fair trial, especially the First Additional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and to issue the declaration required by Article 22 of the Convention against Torture, in order for the treaties monitoring bodies to receive and examine the individual claims, especially as the Moroccan Government (the Prime Minister’s services) declared in February 2005, that the Moroccan State decided to ratify those international instruments and withdraw the reservations made upon many of these conventions. However, so far no provision has been taken.

2.      It is necessary that the Moroccan state ratify three major conventions with regards to human rights and the right to justice and taking action against flagrant violations of human rights; the measures concern the following conventions:

First: The Rome Convention concerning the statute of the International Criminal Court;

Second: UN Convention Against Corruption;

Third: ILO Convention N° 87 Protecting the Freedom to Associate and the Right to Organize.

3.      The authority of international conventions over internal laws in case of a text conflict has to be plainly stated in the Moroccan Constitution; the Constitutional Council has to be clearly mandated to state in the constitutionality of the legal texts whose conflict with the ratified international conventions is suspected; laws or international conventions have to be easily referred by a parliament minority to the constitutional council to state in their constitutionality;

4.      Reforming the Supreme Council for the Magistracy has to be integrated to the constitutional and institutional reform as a top priority, mainly by reinforcing its prerogatives, reconsidering its structure and through its democratization. Thus enabling it to become a constitutional institution capable of ensuring judicial independence and a sound management of its affairs as well as contributing to the reform of its conditions (see the section on institutional reform);

5.      Moroccan legislation has to be tuned on international obligations and conventions in all the fields related to human rights, including condemning the stark violations of human rights in Moroccan law, especially war crimes and genocides; the criminal procedure’s guarantees have to be adapted to the international standards concerning a fair trial, including the guarantees pertaining to the rights of the indicted, the rights of the defence and judicial independence.

2-     Institutional reform

1.      The Moroccan State has to engage, as early as possible, according to the recommendations of Moroccan and international jurist associations and the Treaties Monitoring Bodies, and in conformity with the recommendations of the Equity and Reconciliation Instance, in a deep reform of the institution of the Supreme Council for Magistracy, by driving its statute to be determined – after the constitutional reform – by virtue of an organic law and to set it as the main authority governing the magistrates’ career and the judiciary system in terms of its principles and ethics. The statute have also to reconsider the organization of the judiciary and see to it that non-judicial parties are represented in this council, ensure its organic, administrative and financial independence from the executive branch, and to make sure it has a decent compound.

2.      The Moroccan state has to recognize the internationally recognized right of the magistrates to associate and organize into independent professional unions, far from any sort of upper handing or interference, and in full respect of the magistrates’ right to free thought and expression, especially in terms of their contribution in assessing the conditions of the judiciary and suggesting the relevant reforms, given that such a contribution is not only a right but an obligation;

3.      The Moroccan State has to reinforce the tools to ensure democratic and legal control to prevent deviations, corruption and the influence of money on running the judiciary system and to guarantee fair opportunity in resorting to and benefiting from the decisions of justice.

4.      Morocco has to integrate the reform of the judiciary in a comprehensive project seeking to enhance democracy and set the rule of law, including, given the previous recommendations, paying particular attention to the issues of an up-to-the point training for magistrates, lawyers and auxiliaries of justice, motivating magistrates and justice assistants and modernizing the judicial system, and to reorganize legal professions within the frame of the legal and moral principle in force in democratic systems. Morocco also needs to stiffen the disciplinary measures against any case of intervention, no matter its source, in the judiciary process and to set deterrent sentences against the non execution of judicial decisions whether committed by administrations, public institutions and local authorities or by private people.

3-     The role of civil and political society

1.      Political parties, unions, bars and jurist organisations and all the civil society organisms have, each within its own sphere of influence, to play a full and comprehensive role in the legal reform process, and to be up to their responsibilities in urging the constitutional institutions, at all levels, to undertake their duties with regard to enacting the previous recommendations, which are but a sound execution of Morocco’s international obligations and many of the constitutional provisions deviated both in their statement and implementation;

2.      Jurist associations and the Moroccan Bar Association have to intensify their cooperation in the fields of judicial reform including:

·        Building a consensus around the issue of a comprehensive reform of the Judiciary;

·        Using all the available means to ensure that magistrates are involved in the process of the forwarded proposals and to voice their relevance;

·        Holding a national-level conference to conceive the relevant tools to ensure success of the reform process and to counter all impeding or opposing attempts whatever be their origin;

·        Resisting the interventions seeking to undermine judicial independence and use the judiciary as a means to violate the magistrates’ liberties and fundamental rights, including the rights to organize, the freedom of the press, political union and associative action;

·        Setting a specialized mechanism representing all Moroccan jurist organisations, tasked with following up the process of judicial reform and raising the necessary human and financial resources for its implementation.

 

© َAssociation ADALA 2007. Tous droits réservés.

.

الصفحة الأولى

القانون الأساسي

 تقارير و دراسات

منشورات

أنشطة الجمعية

البرنامج السنوي

بيانات و مواقف

نصوص قانونية

أقوال الصحافة

الاتصال